THEY WERE NOT HUMAN: TEN INCREDIBLE HUMANOID ENCOUNTERS

P
Preston Dennett
·
November 15, 2025
31.8K views
Tier 1First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: Akseli Kääpä, David Ree, Doris and Joe

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
documentaryTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

Akseli Kääpä

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

David Ree

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Doris and Joe

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

The Encounter

The person in this account is Preston Dennit, who discusses various UAP encounters. He mentions events from 1914 to 2018, focusing on different humanoid sightings. One key event occurred in August 1914 in Alistaro, Finland. A boy named Akseli witnessed a large sphere near his home, which had strange effects on him and his surroundings. He described seeing entities and experiencing a loud noise. After the encounter, Akseli felt a significant change in his life. Dennit also references other encounters from different countries and emphasizes the ongoing interest in these phenomena, suggesting a shift in understanding about extraterrestrial life.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The video discusses various historical events related to UFO sightings and encounters with non-human entities from 1914 to 2018. It highlights specific incidents, including testimonies from individuals who claim to have witnessed these events.

Primary Revelation

UFOs have been reported to have visited Earth, with numerous historical accounts spanning over a century.

П
Престон Деннит
journalistpro disclosure

Сара сгәы хыҭхыҭуеит ауманоидтә ҭагылазаашьа ҿыцқәа шәара шәзы ишәыдысгаларц.

Т
Тапани Кунингис
scientistunknown
Мурви Вертанин
А
Аксели Қәапала
witnessunknown
К
Кристофер Муре
journalistpro disclosure

Сара издыруам жәҩан ахь схы здызхалаз.

Д
Девид Риз
contractor employeeunknown
Д
Дорис
witnessunknown
О
Оуен
witnessunknown
non human intelligencevague

УФО-қәа ҳаамҭазтәи época алагаанӡа, ҳуманоидқәа ҳпланета иаҭаауан.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари раԥхьатәи ঘটনা аҵарауаҩ Тапани Кунингис, Мурви Вертанин рнапы иуҳәан.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 1954 шықәсазы маи 30 азы Австралиа, Ист-Мелвин ақалақь аҿы ҟалеит.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 1961 шықәсазы иун мзазы хәылбыҽхак Нью-Орлеан, Луизиана.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 1976 шықәсазы маи мзазы Риџьфилд, Коннектикут.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 1981 шықәсазы март 12 азы Елько Кобра, Испаниа.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 2012 шықәсазы, Аҧсуа Каролина.

Source: Престон Деннит
historical eventspecific

Ари аиқәшәара 2018 шықәсазы ноиабр 17 азы Олбани, Орегон.

Source: Престон Деннит
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Akseli Kääpä experienced a UAP event at age 10 in Finland involving a large sphere and humanoid figures.

Akseli Kääpä · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1914-08-01Year: 1914

Aliastaro, Finland

finland

rural
3 witnesses mentionedAkseli KappalaMaria FoltTapani Kunigis

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE31 entityhumanoid
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 16/21first person
Detail & Specificity
3/3
Corroboration
2/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
3/3
Perceptual Clarity
3/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents a detailed narrative of a UAP encounter involving multiple witnesses and specific events, particularly focusing on a case from 1914 in Finland. However, the credibility of the witnesses and the clarity of the observations are not fully established, leading to a moderate score.

background contextunknown

The experiencer discusses various humanoid encounters and the historical context of UAP events from 1914 to 2018.

Уаанӡа ишәмаҳац ҳәа агәра ганы сыҟоуп.

initial encounterminutes

The experiencer describes an encounter in Finland in 1914 involving a young boy and a UFO.

Ари событие ҟалеит 1914 шықәсазы август мзазы Финландиа, Алистаро шәһәр аҿы.

detailed experienceminutes

The experiencer recounts the details of the encounter, including the appearance of a sphere and interactions with entities.

Убас ала, уи адгьыл ахыхь иҟан, насгьы ҳәаа змамӡа ииааланы еиҳагьы рзааигәахара.

interaction with entitiesminutes

The experiencer describes a conversation with an entity that emerged from the sphere.

Уажәшьҭа и разговаривает. Акы аҳәоит.

conclusion of encounterunknown

The experiencer notes the end of the encounter as the entity departs.

Ус анакәха, абри абара уақыт бәрзеи минуҭқәак рауан.

visualextraordinary
8/10

The experiencer saw a sphere and entities.

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

The experiencer heard conversations with entities.

electromagneticextraordinary
6/10

Mention of electromagnetic effects.

humanoid(few)
80%
DemeanorneutralCommunicationverbalInteractionnot stated

Appearance: described as children

Message: The entity communicated verbally with the experiencer.

Уажәшьҭа и разговаривает. Акы аҳәоит.

Shapesphere
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementhovering
Five Observables (2/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a sphere that hovered and interacted with entities.

What makes this encounter unique

This encounter is unique due to its historical context and the interaction with humanoid entities.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

David Ree reported seeing a UAP in Melbourne, Australia, involving multiple witnesses.

David Ree · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1961-06-018:00 AMYear: 1961

restaurant in New Orleans

New Orleans, Louisiana, united_states

urban
Connected Encounters (1)
Greenwood Cemetery
2 witnesses mentionedDorisJoe

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 11/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The account presents a detailed narrative of a UAP encounter, but lacks credible witness context and corroboration. The observations are somewhat clear but not exceptionally detailed, and there are no physical effects reported. The report appears to be influenced by prior knowledge of UAP phenomena.

initial sightingseconds

The experiencer describes seeing a large object resembling a plate hovering above the ground, with a group of people present.

Плита-like ақы кругла 40 фут мамзаргьы 50 фут ҟынтә адгьыл аҟынтәи иаԥшит.

engagement with witnessesminutes

Witnesses engage in conversation about the sighting, expressing disbelief and curiosity about the object.

Иубама уи? Иџьашьахәызма?

post-sighting reflectionunknown

The experiencer reflects on the event and its implications, discussing military interest and personal feelings about the encounter.

Уи сара схаҿы иааз мацара акәӡамызт.

noeticextraordinary
7/10

Sudden understanding of the significance of the event

visualextraordinary
8/10

Large plate-like object hovering above the ground

auditory
5/10

Conversations among witnesses expressing disbelief

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapedisc
Size40-50 feet
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a large disc-shaped object hovering above the ground, described as plate-like.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a large disc-shaped object witnessed by multiple people, leading to significant discussion and reflection on its implications.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Doris and Joe experienced a UAP event in New Orleans in 1961, involving a close encounter with humanoids.

Doris and Joe · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2 witnesses mentionedDorisJoey

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE3Duration: total estimated duration of the encounter1 entityhumanoid
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 11/21first person
Detail & Specificity
2/3
Corroboration
1/3
Physical Evidence
1/3
Unpredictability
2/3
Perceptual Clarity
2/3
Timely Reporting
2/3
Witness Credibility
1/3

The account presents a detailed narrative of a UAP encounter but lacks credible witness context and corroboration. The observations are somewhat clear but not exceptionally detailed or verifiable, leading to a low evidential strength score.

initial sightingminutes

The experiencer and others observed a large object for about 10 minutes, noting a sense of awe and fear.

Усҟан аныҟәарақәа зегьы арӷьарахь ицозшәа ҳбон, насгьы ашьҭахьтәи алашара ыҟамызт

close encounterminutes

The experiencer felt a strong connection to the entities and the environment, experiencing a sense of time distortion.

Ус ҳтәан. Ҳазцәажәомызт.

telepathic interactionunknown

The experiencer received telepathic messages from an entity, indicating a deeper understanding of their presence.

Сара сцом, Џьои Идеи рымцакәа.

return to normalcyminutes

After the encounter, the experiencer returned to their normal environment, feeling disoriented and reflective.

Ус анакәха, ари абара зегьы 10 минуҭ раҟара ицон.

noeticextraordinary
9/10

Received telepathic insights and knowledge

visualextraordinary
8/10

Observed a large object with distinct features

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

Heard a voice that was not physically present

humanoid(few)
80%
DemeanorneutralCommunicationtelepathyInteractionconsensual contact

Message: Telepathic communication about their presence and intentions.

Сара сцом, Џьои Идеи рымцакәа.

Shapeunknown
Size60-80 feet
Luminositynot stated
Soundsilent
Movementhovering
Five Observables (2/5)
positive lift low observability hypersonic velocity trans medium travel instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer observed a large object hovering silently, with a significant size estimate.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a telepathic communication with entities and a significant distortion of time perception.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
documentaryTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10
1

Akseli Kääpä

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3
2

David Ree

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
3

Doris and Joe

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3