I Thought the End of the World Had Come! Ten Truly Weird UFO Encounters of the Second Kind

P
Preston Dennett
·
October 17, 2026
25.8K views
Tier 1 — First Person EncounterInterview with Experiencer
Experiencer: James P. Sharp, Mr. J. E. Johnston, Jack Robertson, Joseph Bennett, David Busby, Smithson Family, Andrea Richards & Children, Michael Satsi, Vijaya Kumaran, Akumar, & Kumar Lingam, Jane

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
documentaryTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10

James P. Sharp

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated

Mr. J. E. Johnston

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Jack Robertson

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2

Joseph Bennett

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2

David Busby

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Smithson Family

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2

Andrea Richards & Children

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3

Michael Satsi

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2

Vijaya Kumaran, Akumar, & Kumar Lingam

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

Jane

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1

The Encounter

The encounter involves Andrea Richards and her two children driving at night near St. Helens, Tasmania, on September 16, 1974. While driving, their car suddenly lost power, and all electrical systems failed. They noticed a bright light illuminating the road and fields. A powerful vibration and noise shook the car, causing Andrea to feel intense electrical shocks and a strong gas smell. She thought the end of the world had come. They abandoned the car and ran two miles to seek help. After the encounter, Andrea and her daughter experienced lasting effects from the incident, indicating a significant impact on their well-being.

✦ AI Generated

Program Intelligence Analysis

Executive Summary

The video presents a series of UFO encounters classified as close encounters of the second kind, where UFOs have physical effects on the environment or witnesses. Each case spans from 1943 to 2016, showcasing a variety of incidents from around the world, including physiological effects, electromagnetic disturbances, and physical evidence. The cases highlight the need for further investigation into these phenomena.

Primary Revelation

Multiple witnesses have reported significant physiological effects and environmental disturbances associated with UFO encounters.

J
James P. Sharp
witnessneutral

“I stopped. And when I did, I looked to the northwest and saw over the top of a mountain the brightest star I have ever seen.”

J
J. E. Johnston
witnessneutral

“It stunned me, not from the sight of it, but almost as if some ray that it gave out.”

J
Jack Robertson
witnessneutral

“I was scared to death.”

J
Joseph Bennett
witnessneutral

“I thought it was a rush of wind.”

D
David Busby
witnessneutral

“I learned how to fly.”

T
Terry Turner
investigatorneutral
A
Andrea Richards
witnessneutral

“I thought the end of the world had come.”

M
Michael Satsi
witnessneutral

“I was very astonished.”

J
Jane
witnessneutral

“I felt numb.”

non human intelligencespecific

James P. Sharp witnessed a bright object that affected the environment by lifting debris and creating a suction effect.

Source: James P. Sharp
non human intelligencespecific

Mr. J. E. Johnston experienced physiological effects after a close encounter with a UFO, including numbness and chest pains.

Source: J. E. Johnston
non human intelligencespecific

Jack Robertson received a sunburn after a close encounter with a glowing UFO.

Source: Jack Robertson
non human intelligencespecific

Joseph Bennett witnessed a UFO that split a tree in two, leaving behind physical evidence.

Source: Joseph Bennett
non human intelligencespecific

David Busby experienced levitation and saw UFOs during two distinct encounters.

Source: David Busby
non human intelligencespecific

The Smithson family experienced multiple unusual incidents including a missing pig and physiological effects after a UFO encounter.

Source: Smithson family
non human intelligencespecific

Andrea Richards and her children experienced electrical disturbances and physiological effects during a UFO encounter.

Source: Andrea Richards
non human intelligencespecific

Michael Satsi observed a large UFO that emitted electromagnetic effects and caused his car to stop functioning.

Source: Michael Satsi
non human intelligencespecific

Three boys experienced temporary blindness and paralysis after attempting to touch a UFO.

Source: Vijaya Kumaran, Akumar, Kumar Lingam
non human intelligencespecific

Jane and other children experienced paralysis and time distortion during a close encounter with a UFO.

Source: Jane
✦ AI-extracted program intelligence — verify against source testimony
1

Witnessed a bright UFO that affected the environment by lifting debris and covering his car with trash.

James P. Sharp · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1943-10-01Year: 1943

some location outside of Salt Lake City

Salt Lake City, Utah, united_states

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
not statednot_statedDuration: not_stated
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 8/21commentary
◎Detail & Specificity
1/3
≡Corroboration
1/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
◇Unpredictability
2/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
1/3
◷Timely Reporting
1/3
★Witness Credibility
1/3

The speaker discusses UFO encounters of the second kind but does not provide specific first-person accounts or detailed evidence from any particular case. The claims about the types of evidence are general and lack specific details or corroboration.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

not stated

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
2

Experienced physiological effects after seeing a bright circular UFO that stunned him.

Mr. J. E. Johnston · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1943-10-01around sundownYear: 1943

along US Route 40

Salt Lake City, Utah, united_states

ruralmountains

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 15/21first person
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
1/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
3/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account provides a detailed first-person narrative from James P. Sharp, including specific observations of the object's brightness and behavior. However, the lack of corroboration and the subjective nature of the experience limit its evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

While driving, James noticed a very bright object in the sky that he initially thought was a star.

“I looked to the northwest and saw over the top of a mountain the brightest star I have ever seen.”

object approachesunknown

The object moved closer to him as he drove, revealing itself to be some type of airship.

“I judged it to be about 5 ft across and surrounding this was a real bright red light like a hot iron.”

close observationunknown

James pulled off the road to observe the object more closely, noting its brightness and the sparks it emitted.

“I could see a very bright light almost like welders use when they cover their eyes with a dark mask.”

visualextraordinary
8/10

Saw a very bright object in the sky that changed appearance as it approached.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapeunknown
Size5 ft across
Colorvery bright light, bright red light
Luminosityself luminous
Soundnot stated
Movementrotating
Five Observables (0/5)
✗ positive lift✗ low observability✗ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✗ instantaneous acceleration

James observed a bright object that appeared to be an airship, emitting sparks and rotating as it approached.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a bright object that emitted sparks and appeared to be attempting to land, which is unusual for typical UAP sightings.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
3

Saw a glowing red UFO that burned his face and chest, leaving him with a sunburn.

Jack Robertson · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

near a hamburger stand along the road

mountain about 10 miles to the southeast
2 witnesses mentionedJames
Reported to authorities

man with a red lantern asked him to keep still about what he saw

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE2
High Evidential StrengthScore: 18/21first person
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
3/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
3/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account provides a detailed first-person narrative of a UAP encounter, including environmental effects and a witness interaction that adds some corroboration. However, the witness's credibility is unclear, and while there are specific details, they lack independent verification.

initial sightingunknown

James first notices the object about three miles away, which begins to move closer.

“it appeared to James to be about three miles away and still moving closer”

environmental interactionunknown

The object affects the environment by pulling hay, straw, and small bushes around it, marking the transition to a close encounter of the second kind.

“the UFO reached this house and I could see the suction pulling hay, straw, and small bushes and whirling them around behind whatever it was”

departure of the objectunknown

After the object moves off, James exits his car and observes it moving towards a mountain.

“So now the object moved off, and as it did, James exited his car and saw this object moving over to a mountain”

post-encounter interactionunknown

James encounters a man with a red lantern who instructs him to keep quiet about the sighting.

“Then he said, 'Keep still about what you saw for the time being. We have located it.'”

visualextraordinary
8/10

James sees the object and its effects on the environment

tactile
6/10

james feels the car rocking

auditory
5/10

james hears a sound like a jet

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundsilent
Movementhovering
Five Observables (1/5)
✓ positive lift✗ low observability✗ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✗ instantaneous acceleration

James observes a UFO that affects the environment by creating a suction effect and moving silently.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter uniquely involved environmental interaction, marking it as a close encounter of the second kind.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
4

Witnessed a UFO that split a tree in two, leaving behind physical evidence.

Joseph Bennett · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1947-06-281:30 AMYear: 1947

Waterlue, Iowa

Waterloo, Iowa, united_states

1 witness mentionedJ. E. Johnston
Reported to authorities
Connected Events
1947 UFO waveJune 1947

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE2
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 10/21commentary
◎Detail & Specificity
2/3
≡Corroboration
1/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
◇Unpredictability
2/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
1/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
1/3

The speaker discusses historical UAP cases but does not provide a first-person account or detailed evidence from specific encounters. The claims lack direct witness testimony and rely on secondary sources, resulting in low evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

The encounter began with a sighting of a craft that was visually striking and memorable.

“As James says, with dark glasses on was a very beautiful site.”

close encounterunknown

The experiencer describes a close encounter with a craft that exhibited unusual properties, including the lifting of debris.

“I suspect that there's electromagnetic fields of some kind surrounding these craft.”

reflection on experienceunknown

The experiencer reflects on the significance of the encounter and its place in the broader context of UFO sightings.

“Such an unusual case of a close encounter of the second kind.”

visualextraordinary
8/10

The craft was visually striking and beautiful.

electromagneticextraordinary
7/10

Electromagnetic fields suspected around the craft.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (1/5)
✓ positive lift✗ low observability✗ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✗ instantaneous acceleration

The craft exhibited unusual properties, including the ability to lift debris, suggesting advanced technology.

What makes this encounter unique

This encounter is notable for its early occurrence in the history of UFO sightings and the unique properties of the craft observed.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
5

Had two connected UFO encounters involving levitation and a display of lights.

David Busby · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

yard near the house

2 witnesses mentionedMr. J Ehis wife

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 17/21first person
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
3/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
3/3
◷Timely Reporting
1/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents a clear and detailed observation of a UAP, with specific physical effects reported on the witness. However, the lack of corroboration and the witness's credibility context limits the overall evidential strength.

initial sightingunknown

The witness saw a bright, shiny, circular object swooping down across his yard, startling him.

“I was startled to see a bright, shiny, circular object swooping down across my yard about 25 ft away from me.”

physical effectsunknown

The witness experienced a numbing sensation from head to feet, affecting his ability to move.

“It stunned me, not from the sight of it, but almost as if some ray that it gave out. I could hardly get into the house.”

Aftermathdays

The witness suffered physical pains and difficulty moving his arm, which persisted into the following day.

“I was suffering pains in my chest. I had difficulty raising my arm.”

visualextraordinary
8/10

Bright, shiny, circular object

tactileextraordinary
9/10

numbness from head to feet

auditory
6/10

rocketlike swishing sound

proprioceptiveextraordinary
7/10

difficulty moving arm

electromagneticextraordinary
8/10

Electromagnetic field affecting the witness

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapedisc
Size12 ft wide
Colorbright and shiny
Luminosityself luminous
Soundnot stated
Movementswooping
Five Observables (3/5)
✓ positive lift✗ low observability✓ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✓ instantaneous acceleration

The witness observed a bright, shiny, circular object that swooped down across his yard, emitting a rocketlike sound.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a significant physical effect on the witness, including numbness and chest pain, which he attributes directly to the UAP.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
6

Experienced multiple UFO incidents involving missing livestock and physiological effects.

Smithson Family · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1950-04-209:00 PMYear: 1950

about 9 miles west of Lufkin on Highway 94

Lufkin, Texas, united_states

ruralremote highway
1 witness mentionedJack Robertson
Reported to authorities

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE2
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 14/21commentary
◎Detail & Specificity
2/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
1/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
2/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account discusses a specific case involving a witness named Jack Robertson but lacks detailed evidence and corroboration. While it mentions physical evidence, the specifics of that evidence are not provided, leading to a low overall score.

initial encounterunknown

The witness experiences a strange feeling while driving, indicating the beginning of the encounter.

“he started to get a strange quote feeling”

post encounterunknown

The encounter concludes with the witness reflecting on the experience and its implications.

“don't get too close to a ufo”

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

What makes this encounter unique

The witness was a skeptic who had a significant emotional reaction to the encounter, which adds a unique perspective to the case.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
7

Encountered a UFO that caused their car to lose power and left them with physical effects.

Andrea Richards & Children · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details

side of the road

1 witness mentionedJack

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE3
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 16/21first person
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
2/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
3/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
1/3

The account provides a detailed description of the UAP encounter, including specific observations of the object's appearance and behavior. However, the witness's credibility is not established, and while there are some corroborative elements, they are limited.

initial sightingunknown

Jack notices a bright red glowing craft appearing ahead of him while driving.

“a bright red glowing craft of some kind appeared ahead of him on the road about 600 ft up”

close encounterseconds

The craft hovers directly over Jack's head, creating a shocking experience.

“the bottom was only about 12 ft from me”

craft departureseconds

The craft takes off quickly, leaving Jack in awe.

“it made a whooshing roar when it took off”

physical effectsminutes

Jack experiences a burning sensation on his face after the encounter.

“he began to feel a burning sensation on his face”

visualextraordinary
8/10

bright red glowing craft

tactile
6/10

burning sensation on face

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

whooshing roar when the craft took off

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapeunknown
Size8 feet across
Colordull red
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementhovering, instant acceleration
Five Observables (2/5)
✓ positive lift✗ low observability✗ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✓ instantaneous acceleration

Jack observed a bright red glowing craft that hovered above him and then took off quickly, emitting fiery sparks.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a close proximity to a glowing craft that emitted sparks and a loud sound, leading to a significant physical effect on the experiencer.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
8

Observed a large UFO that caused his car to stop and exhibited unusual movements.

Michael Satsi · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1958-12-31Year: 1958

Port Glennon

united_kingdom

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
close encounterCE2
Low Evidential StrengthScore: 12/21commentary
◎Detail & Specificity
2/3
≡Corroboration
1/3
↑Physical Evidence
2/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
2/3
◷Timely Reporting
1/3
★Witness Credibility
1/3

The account discusses a UAP encounter with some personal effects reported, but lacks specific details about the witness and corroboration. The claims are speculative and do not provide sufficient evidence for a higher score.

initial encounterminutes

The experiencer describes feeling a burn on his face and chest after an encounter with a UFO, which he initially thought were hallucinations.

“I thought they were hallucinations, just as other people have thought, but I believe in them now.”

post-encounter effectsunknown

The experiencer reflects on the physical effects of the encounter, specifically a sunburn-like sensation that appeared after the UFO was gone.

“I didn't feel any burn until about 5 minutes after it was gone.”

visual
5/10

Witness saw a UFO for the first time

tactile
6/10

Experiencer felt a burning sensation

electromagneticextraordinary
7/10

Electromagnetic field effects suggested

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Five Observables (0/5)
✗ positive lift✗ low observability✗ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✗ instantaneous acceleration

The experiencer describes seeing a UFO for the first time, which led to a physical reaction.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter led to a significant change in belief about UFOs, transitioning from skepticism to belief after experiencing physical effects.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
9

Encountered a UFO that emitted beams of light causing temporary vision loss.

Vijaya Kumaran, Akumar, & Kumar Lingam · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
1958-12-28Year: 1958

fields near a row of oak trees

Port Glennon Antran, united_kingdom

ruralfarmland
Reported to authorities

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
High Evidential StrengthScore: 18/21reported
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
3/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
3/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account provides a detailed description of the encounter, including specific observations and effects on the environment. However, it lacks corroboration from other witnesses or physical evidence, which limits its overall evidential strength.

initial sightingseconds

Joseph hears a strange noise and sees a large black object approaching his location.

“I was out walking in my fields when suddenly there was a strange noise in the sky.”

object interactionseconds

The object descends and strikes a tree, splitting it in two before disappearing.

“It hit a 40ft high oak tree, splitting it in two.”

Disappearanceseconds

The object vanishes into the sky after hitting the tree.

“It had vanished by the time the tree crashed to the ground.”

visualextraordinary
8/10

Saw a large black object and a tree being split.

auditoryextraordinary
7/10

Heard a strange noise and a hissing sound.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Shapeirregular
Size7 ft across
Colorblack
Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementdescending
Five Observables (3/5)
✗ positive lift✓ low observability✓ hypersonic velocity✓ trans medium travel✗ instantaneous acceleration

Joseph observed a large black object that descended rapidly and struck a tree, splitting it before vanishing.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter involved a rapid descent of a large object that split a tree in two before disappearing, showcasing extraordinary speed and interaction with the environment.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony
10

Witnessed a UFO that paralyzed her and other children while they were playing.

Jane · First-Person

Encounter Context

Factual Details
2 witnesses mentionedJosephRobert
Reported to authorities

investigators were split into two different camps

Encounter Research Breakdown

Phenomenological Analysis
physical sightingCE1
Moderate Evidential StrengthScore: 16/21reported
◎Detail & Specificity
3/3
≡Corroboration
2/3
↑Physical Evidence
2/3
◇Unpredictability
3/3
◉Perceptual Clarity
2/3
◷Timely Reporting
2/3
★Witness Credibility
2/3

The account presents a detailed narrative of Joseph's experience and subsequent investigations into the tree damage, but lacks a direct first-person account from Joseph himself. The presence of multiple investigators adds some credibility, but the conclusions drawn vary significantly, limiting corroboration.

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

visualextraordinary
8/10

Witnessed a fast-moving object in the sky

The analysis found no relevant content for this section.

Luminositynot stated
Soundnot stated
Movementinstant acceleration
Five Observables (2/5)
✗ positive lift✗ low observability✓ hypersonic velocity✗ trans medium travel✓ instantaneous acceleration

Joseph observed an object moving at incredible speed, which later led to investigations regarding the damage to a tree.

What makes this encounter unique

The encounter is unique due to the physical evidence of tree damage and the subsequent division of belief among witnesses and investigators.

✦ AI-extracted phenomenological analysis — verify against source testimony

Have you had a similar experience?

Many people have reported encounters they struggle to explain. You are not alone. Project Profound collects and analyzes these accounts to advance understanding.

Talk about it with AI →

Analysis Summary

Program Intel Profile
documentaryTopic: otherIntel Value: 8/10
1

James P. Sharp

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: not_stated
2

Mr. J. E. Johnston

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
3

Jack Robertson

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2
4

Joseph Bennett

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2
5

David Busby

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
6

Smithson Family

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2
7

Andrea Richards & Children

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE3
8

Michael Satsi

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE2
9

Vijaya Kumaran, Akumar, & Kumar Lingam

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1
10

Jane

First-Person

Contact Experience Triad

Hynek: CE1